Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Argument - Essay subjectAlthough many prefer to practice premarital cohabitation, whatsoever sectors who argon conservative within the society tantrum premarital cohabitation as abominable. This is because of the consequences it brings. To them cohabitation causes confusion among younger generations and new(prenominal) passel. They find the value of marri climb on and marriage security measure for granted. Marriage becomes a matter of ceremony without importance because they do not exactly know what constitutes marriage. However, some people find marriage as not the sole criterion of confusion among younger groups when considering the affinity of couples. In fact, youth who comes from a family whose p bents are married notwithstanding quarrel most of the time are more confused. Younger generations who understand the goal of premarital cohabitation may find it not confusing and may consider it a better option of marriage. This idea is supported in the article of Budinski & Tr ovato (72) where they made it benefit that cohabitation is a viable alternative for marriage especially to those who do not have the confidence in entering a long term marriage just yet. They further stated that when couples cohabit, components of marriage are present like sharing of home, sexual intimacy, childbearing, and economic resources. With this, the couple may live like conserve and wife just the same where they can enjoy playing their role as partners and parents. Individuals of any age who understand this purpose may consider premarital cohabitation as a springboard to marriage. Thus this does not post confusion. People who are against living unneurotic before marriage or premarital cohabitation charter that entering such situation may result in habitually changing their partners and are discover to be having difficulty finding a lifelong partner. This practice gives a belief that repeated cohabitation would be a predictor for future marriage failures as a result of dummying out process. Through selection, the somebody may change partner every now and then. However, observation shows that cohabiters and non cohabiters experience divorce at closely the same rate. In the study of Bruderl and company (1), they explained that it is not the cohabitation that increases the chance of couples separation but rather mismatches of some psychological traits. Once the mismatch traits are detected, it is likely that the person is going to weed out those incompatible traits resulting in an improved experience which makes the next relationship a success. This is evident among couples who were belatedly questioned in their answers that they are improving their chances of success in their marital relationship with their experience thus the preponderance of separation or divorce is reduced in the subsequent relationship. A large number of people especially Muslims believe that the practice of premarital cohabitation is better because it ensures stronger compat ibility and commitment of couples. To be compatible needs appointment to each other. Perhaps the way couples do this would be to live together. Couples have to be close together to really observe the way each lives. Doing this could help couples find out if they could bear each other without too much tension, quarrels and other problems. If they find out that they are comfortable with each others lifestyle, then they may consider marriage. However, if they are not, then it would be easy for them to just break apart because of the absence of legal paper works and commitment. Taxes would be easier to handle